|
Speed read:
|
I — The return of sovereign risk: debt becomes political
The end of the monetary illusion
Since 2008 and 2020, central banks blurred market signals by becoming the marginal buyers of public debt. Interest rates no longer reflected risk evaluation but served as instruments of economic policy.
With the return of inflation, this era ends. Central banks can no longer absorb public debt indefinitely without compromising their credibility. The consequence is simple: states must return to the market, facing more selective and informed investors.
Deficits now structural
Deficits are structural because states finance long-term transformations rather than temporary shocks. Budget priorities are no longer cyclical but redefine the economy itself: rearmament, energy transition, aging population, industrial reshoring, and support for critical technologies, all politically essential and economically heavy.
Governments now borrow not to cushion a crisis but to adapt their productive model to a more conflictual, fragmented world. Investors now focus not only on cyclical trajectories but on states’ ability to fund permanent commitments under higher rates and stricter fiscal constraints.
The immediate consequence: markets demand a premium, not because debt mechanically increases, but because its nature changes. It becomes a strategic choice, not just a macroeconomic adjustment. Budget sustainability depends as much on political and institutional coherence as on the numbers themselves.
Demographic aging amplifies these dynamics by shrinking the tax base, increasing health and retirement spending, and weighing on potential productivity. Debt thus becomes an intergenerational issue, complicating the financing of strategic priorities.
The return of differentiation
For over a decade, sovereign debts were treated almost interchangeably, protected by artificially low rates and central bank interventions. This era is over. Investors now return to classical, demanding evaluations of sovereign risk: political coherence, institutional strength, and long-term fiscal credibility.
Europe is particularly affected. Long sheltered by unified monetary policy, the continent now faces internal divergences. The gap between collective ambition and national realities exposes Europe’s fragility.
Rising real rates increase pressure, raising capital costs for states and businesses, reshuffling asset hierarchies, and reducing fiscal flexibility. In a world with permanently positive real rates, fiscal discipline is no longer a political choice; it is a financial constraint.
II — Europe and its founding paradox
A wealthy but incomplete financial region
The EU has abundant savings, many competitive companies, and a market of 450 million consumers. Yet it struggles to define strategic priorities, implement them, finance them, and translate them into tangible economic outcomes.
Structurally, Europe suffers from a fragmented capital market, underdeveloped venture capital, and chronic inability to channel savings into productive investment. Societally, some financial flows serve social objectives, limiting their use for industrial or strategic projects.
Compared to other global powers: the US has a massive federal budget, integrated capital markets, and fast intervention capacity (e.g., Inflation Reduction Act, defense programs). China mobilizes a dirigiste model aligning credit, investment, and technology with strategic goals. Europe alone combines high geopolitical ambitions with fragmented fiscal tools, explaining its vulnerability.
An unfinished single market
Thirty years after its creation, Europe’s single market remains incomplete in key sectors: services, finance, digital, and taxation. Fragmentation hinders growth, prevents European champions from emerging, and limits collective responses.
The taboo of mutualization: a political problem
Debt mutualization would be economically rational. reducing financing costs, creating a safe European asset, and providing investment capacity comparable to a federal power, but it is politically explosive.
Europe must act as a power: fund defense, energy transition, and industrial policy without having the budgetary instruments of a true power. The EU budget is only ~1% of GDP, compared to 20%+ in the US. Divergences among member states exacerbate this contradiction.
A pragmatic solution: partial, targeted mutualization to fund common-interest projects while limiting permanent transfers. This could mobilize European savings, reduce financing costs, and create a safe asset without full fiscal federalism, complemented by control mechanisms and fiscal discipline.
III — Global Fragmentation Redefines Macroeconomics
End of linear globalization
The world is not deglobalizing; it is fragmenting. Supply chains regionalize, financial flows politicize, and technology becomes a national security issue.
When geopolitics dictates macroeconomics, every state decision becomes an economic shock. Geopolitical tensions affect prices, flows, and financial conditions, redefining national trajectories.
- Geopolitical inflation: supply shocks, energy sanctions, and critical metal restrictions create durable supply shocks. Prices now respond to international power dynamics.
- Growth conditioned by blocs: regionalized value chains, “friend shoring,” and tech barriers redirect investment. Growth depends on alliances as much as fundamentals.
- Deficits dictated by security: rearmament, energy transition, and industrial security are structural, independent of political cycles or fiscal rules.
- Demographics add pressure: aging, energy transition, and reindustrialization create skill shortages, driving wages and inflation. States must fund attractiveness, training, and immigration policies.
- Financial markets sensitive to politics: embargoes, military tensions, or tech controls can revalue or destabilize entire sectors. Political risk is now permanent.
Critical technologies as economic battlefields: semiconductors, AI, batteries, cybersecurity, rare metals, these sectors determine industrial and military sovereignty. Export restrictions, subsidies, and tech alliances reshape value chains and growth trajectories.
Macroeconomics can no longer be read without geopolitics; models must integrate strategic dependencies, rivalries, and security constraints.
IV — Implications for investors
The end of strategic comfort
The implicit framework underpinning markets for over a decade is disappearing. “Buy the dip” relied on central bank or government intervention. That certainty is gone.
Markets now face more frequent, political shocks. Performance dispersion grows. Economies diverge based on institutional quality, political stability, energy dependence, and industrial capacity. Geography becomes crucial: bloc membership, conflict proximity, and supply chain vulnerabilities directly affect valuations.
Risk premiums return
- Geopolitical premium: exposure to strategic dependencies, unstable borders, or supply shocks.
- Institutional premium: governance quality, coalition coherence, fiscal credibility, execution capacity.
- Energy premium: access to abundant, stable, cheap energy shapes industrial competitiveness.
Sovereign bonds are no longer homogeneous; equities no longer share the same multiples. Geography, supply security, and institutional stability become decisive.
A more political allocation
Financial analysis now merges with power analysis. Investment decisions must consider governance, coalitions, and fiscal trajectories. Political decisions, reforms, fiscal choices, energy policies, and industrial priorities now influence asset pricing.
Three potential European trajectories:
- Greater integration with a unified budget and capital market.
- Increasing fragmentation with rising national risk premiums.
- An unstable status quo of temporary compromises and institutional patchwork.
The Union’s position will determine its ability to remain an economic power in a conflictual world.
Conclusion
The regime shift is already here. Debt itself is not the core problem; it depends on the world in which it is issued. That world is more fragmented, conflictual, and uncoordinated. Markets resume their disciplining role because political discipline is lacking. States must fund strategic priorities in a tighter environment where every geopolitical decision affects financial conditions.
Europe is the laboratory of this transition: rich in savings but institutionally fragile, ambitious but limited in tools. Success depends on rethinking its fiscal architecture, assuming collective choices, and overcoming national reflexes. The question is no longer whether this new regime will prevail, it already has. The real challenge is who will anticipate, embrace, and adapt to it with political courage and clarity.