Back

Financial Markets: a fragile calm in a cycle dictated by Ormuz and Washington

It was a short week, but one marked by remarkable volatility. Financial markets continue to swing in response to the U.S. President’s alternating warm‑and‑cold rhetoric, depending on his assessment of the situation in Iran. Investors want to believe in de‑escalation, but as long as the Strait of Hormuz is neither reopened nor clearly on the path to reopening, it is far too early to call an end to the ongoing consolidation phase. Oil remains the ultimate compass in this environment: its inability to correct meaningfully at the start of the week already contrasted with the global equity rally. And the final session, shaken by yet another U.S. threat, reminded everyone how fragile the trend remains, despite a Bloomberg‑reported rumour of Oman–Tehran discussions that briefly lifted sentiment. In the end, markets closed the week in positive territory, but still trapped in a full‑scale spin cycle ahead of the long Easter weekend.

Investment Analysis

1. A market driven by geopolitics, not fundamentals

  • Equity indices are reacting more to political statements than to economic data.
  • The verbal sparring between Washington and Tehran over a Middle East ceasefire is producing erratic, directionless swings.
  • Oil remains the immediate barometer: above USD 100, it becomes a problem for consumers, then for the broader economy.

Investor takeaway: As long as geopolitics dominates, markets will remain hypersensitive and directionally unstable.

2. Oil as the pivot of the entire cycle

  • The early‑week equity euphoria was not confirmed by crude, which barely pulled back.
  • A clear and sustained decline in oil prices is needed to support a durable rally in equities.
  • A barrel above USD 100 reinforces inflationary pressures, complicating the job of central banks.

Investor takeaway: Oil dictates both the macro trajectory and market sentiment.

3. Dollar, U.S. rates and oil: an inseparable trio

  • This trio forms (below) the market’s primary decision framework, far more than corporate earnings.
  • These three assets are moving in lockstep:
    • rising oil → perceived inflation risk rises,
    • higher inflation → upward pressure on real rates,
    • higher rates → stronger dollar.

Investor takeaway: Macro forces dominate everything. Capital flows are adjusting to global risk, not micro fundamentals.

4. Structural, not temporary, volatility

  • Three strong sessions were nearly undone by a single geopolitical headline.
  • A simple rumour of mediation was enough to reverse the trend.
  • The market remains in a state of extreme reactivity, typical of geopolitical transition phases.

Investor takeaway: Volatility will persist as long as the stalemate around Hormuz continues.

Conclusion – Macro Thesis

Markets are navigating an environment where geopolitics sets the tempo, oil defines the boundaries, and U.S. monetary policy determines the amplitude of each move. The current consolidation is not over: it will depend on a clear signal regarding Hormuz and a sustained decline in oil prices. For a disciplined investor, this period calls for careful risk management, a close reading of macro assets (oil, dollar, U.S. rates), and a healthy skepticism toward overly enthusiastic political statements.